Archive for the ‘Lent’ Category


Isolation - Denis Klitsie

Isolation – Denise Klitsie

The first reading for the Second Sunday of Lent is the story of Abraham and Isaac. It is an immensely rich story. Often we hear of Abraham’s faith and this was its demonstration par excellence. We also hear of the parallels to Christ and His own sacrifice, which are striking and many. But why was Abraham called by God, the All Sufficient One, to sacrifice his son? It’s easy to get lost in the typology (as important and necessary as it is!), but typology is founded on history. Abraham was not called to sacrifice his son simply so Christians approximately 1,900 years later could recognize Christ hidden in the Scriptures. The connection between Isaac and Jesus is real, but this means nothing for Abraham in the immediacy of the moment. He has been ordered by God to offer his son in sacrifice. Why? A test of faith. Yes, but why this test? Why not another test? Because this would have been the hardest thing for Abraham to do. Not necessarily; this is the answer of a modern who isn’t surrounded by children being offered to pagan idols on high places. No, Abraham was called to sacrifice his son as a test of faith, precisely because the son of the promise is the one thing concerning which Abraham was consistently faithless.

Answering the call

The LORD said to Abram: Go forth from your land, your relatives, and from your father’s house to a land that I will show you. I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you; I will make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you and curse those who curse you. All the families of the earth will find blessing in you. (Gen 12:1-3)

The call of Abraham was tied to a promise: “I will make of you a great nation.” Later the Lord God makes clear that this nation will come from Abraham’s own line: “… your own offspring will be your heir.” (Gen 15:4) Even though a son was not promised with the initial call to leave his family and go to an unknown land, the promise of a nation coming from him does strongly imply this. It is on this point that Abraham again and again falls into doubt, even after the Lord God explicitly states that this nation will come from Abraham’s own son.

Abraham and Hagar


The great father in faith who left his family and home at the age of 75 for a foreign land, trusted El Shaddai in all things – all things but one. Before the promise of a son was made explicit he gave Sarah to Pharaoh in Egypt and he made plans to have his servant’s son made his heir; after the promise was made explicit he conceived a son with his wife’s maidservant, Hagar, and once again gave his wife away to another, Abimelech, the king of Gerar. These are not just minor failings in faith. This is repeated faithlessness concerning one particular promise and consisted of willful actions that worked in direct contradiction to the realization of that promise. When one is called to prove their faith it means nothing at all to ask of them what they have been consistently faithful about. If faith is to be tested, it must be shown through obedience concerning that which one has been constantly faithless.

Abraham and Isaac


Does the above painting disturb you? What about the painting above that? They should. Faithlessness is ugly. Deep-seated faithlessness leads people to do horrible things. As for faithfulness, it is more often than not a sign of contradiction to the world, so much so that it is seen as abominable. The world is far more comfortable with the actions of a lack of faith than it is with the actions of faith. It’s all well and good to help the poor, but to become a beggar yourself? It’s all well and good to help those in need, but at the expense of your own financial security? The world doesn’t see this as generosity; it sees it as insane. As much as the world would deplore (for a time) an Asa Hawks, it finds incomprehensible at best, and often more deplorable than Hawks, a Hazel Motes (HERE for reference on Asa Hawks and Hazel Motes). For as perverse and monstrous as we may find the reduction of Hagar to a sex-slave for the sake of producing an heir, from the perspective of the world it’s not that hard to have some understanding toward Abraham and Sarah when one truly takes into account the times and the weight of heredity in the ancient world, and the psychological stress that could accompany that. But to be willing to sacrifice one’s own child? Admittedly, even keeping in mind how widespread and accepted child sacrifice was at that time, it is a challenge to understand this. Abraham’s willingness to kill Isaac is not just disturbing; it is practically unimaginable.

Is it really so unimaginable though?

Gloria Steinem abortion shirt

This picture should disturb you too.

It is the act of faith which the modern world finds incomprehensible at best if not absolutely condemnable. The same people who denigrate Christians for worshipping One who called Abraham to sacrifice his son are, very often, the same people who affirm and even celebrate a woman’s so-called right to choose whether or not she will sacrifice her child to any myriad gods of material pragmatic secularism. In a society truly flipped upside down, it is not uncommon for the woman who chooses life to be looked down upon, abused, or abandoned by family, “friends”, and the world at large. Is the modern who rejects the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob willing to look with eyes open and willing to take their earbuds out that they may listen? How is it they do not hear the cry of the woman who has suffered abortion; of the women who have spoken out concerning their treatment, their life, and their real desires? How is it they do not hear the voices of abortion priestesses speaking of money and quotas? How do they not hear the voices of those who worked in the industry, left, and are sharing their story? But most of all how do they not hear the voices and see the incredible beauty of the women who choose life; of the women who stood alone and stalwart against doctors, social workers, family and friends, and gave life to their little one, loved their little one, and entered into great happiness with their child as they grew. These women acted in faith. By doing so they inserted love into pain, dejection, oppression, and death, and by love begot love. How is it that the modern does not see the love, affirm the love, celebrate the love, and fight for love? Perhaps a reason is that arriving at that love means passing through death. The woman who chooses life and the man, Abraham, who was willing to offer a life in sacrifice have a commonality: the dark journey of faith, the transformation of their self through seeing what is not seen, and entry into a life unimagined.

The modern, however, is not the one who has the greatest difficulty with Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice Isaac. It is the modern Christian who has the greatest difficulty with this story, which is why they do not grapple with it. If challenged on the truth of God commanding Abraham to sacrifice his son, the Christian often dismisses the challenge by saying, “But God stopped him.” This may be followed by an explanation of what God wanted to teach Abraham and perhaps even a good bit of typology to show it’s proclamation of Christ and our salvation. However, none of this addresses the fact that God allowed him to go right up to taking the knife, and this is accorded to Abraham as good. Let me say that again, it was accorded to Abraham as good that he was willing to carry out this act. If an act is intrinsically evil (and child sacrifice is) how can we speak of one being good and affirm their being rewarded for being willing to carry out such an act? This question should haunt Christians. If we aren’t willing to grapple with the horror of this event, then we will never have anything better than a superficial understanding of test and type, no matter how “theological” that understanding is, nor a profound understanding of the human, divine, and the relation between the two.

Yet just as from the heavens the rain and the snow come down and do not return there until they have watered the earth, making it fertile and fruitful, giving seed to the one who sows and bread to the one who eats, so shall my word be that goes forth from my mouth. (Is 55:10-11a)

Abraham and the inhabitants of Canaan around him are the earth, the land; a land that is dry and fruitless. Abraham is accorded good because he allowed the word of God to come upon him and seep into him. What is accorded as good is his willingness to do as the Lord commands, not a willingness to kill his son; for, in fact, he did not have a willingness to kill his son. But it was precisely because he did not have willingness to kill his son that he endured the dark journey of faith. In this way, Abraham also has a commonality with the woman who chooses to kill her child though she does not want to. In Abraham, the two different journeys of the darkness of faith and the darkness of forsakenness meet. He has faith in the One who has always provided for him in great abundance; but can we not also speak of his feeling forsaken by this very same One in knowing that his greatest love will be taken?

The image at the top of this post, “Isolation”, expresses the reality of both journeys. In the midst of the world and everyone going about their lives, the faithful and the forsaken stand alone. Abraham acts in faith: he gathers the supplies for the sacrifice, makes provision for the journey, and is accompanied by two servants. There is nothing unusual in this. He is an inhabitant of Canaan preparing to make a sacrifice. The servants think nothing of it, his wife, Sarah, thinks nothing of it, and his son, Isaac, thinks nothing of it. It is a normal act, not out of the ordinary. Abraham is forsaken: he tells no one the true nature of the sacrifice, he carries an oppressive secret within himself and it pulls him further away from those who are with him. How somber all the actions of preparation must have been. How hard it must have been to move his feet though move them he did. How must he have withdrawn further into himself as they made the journey, becoming more silent with each passing day. Did he walk with his shoulders hunched? Could he look the son whom he loved in his eyes? What great interior tears he must have cried (and physical tears?) as they came closer to doom, the extinguishing of all the dreams and joys bound to his son. Confusion. Exasperation. And no one to lean upon. I cannot imagine the constriction of heart he must have endured. He suffered the darkness of faith while bearing the weight of abandonment.


A parched land in Kochi

The dryness of Abraham’s heart came from his living in a dry land – living in the midst of a people who believed that child sacrifice was good. Even though he did not believe this, he was surrounded by and interacted regularly with those who did. This is the situation of Christians living in the West today. We may disagree with the world in matters of sex, marriage, and children, and be horrified by such hateful acts as abortion, but if we are being honest with ourselves most of us have learned to settle with it. We go about our days giving it hardly any thought, if any at all. We go to sleep without conviction for those suffering violence, for people flogged by gnawing dread, or subjected to the nihilism of a frenzied torpidity.


The world has entered our hearts and rages to unseat the Light within. We are Abraham living in Canaan. He received the Word of God, let his dry heart soak it in, and from it God produced a magnificent and succulent bounty. It was not Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice his son that was accorded good. The word he received, that he allowed to root and flower within him, was a question: Do you love Me, or do you love what I have promised you? Do you find satisfaction in Me, or do you find satisfaction in what I have given you? Am I alone your heart’s possession? What was accorded good was his “yes”, and through Abraham’s “yes” the Lord reveals the horror of human sacrifice, the horror of the taking of a child’s life by their parent. (The killing of children by their parents still happens and is accepted in some parts of the world, and I am not only talking about abortion.)

The Lord God who gave His Son asks the same question of us. He requires proof of our love just as He required it of Abraham. But never again did he command someone to offer their child in sacrifice; and never again will He make such a command of anyone. What may He command of us in our own time though, in the dry land of our own day aching for the rains of faith?


The lesson Bella taught me.

I will never forget the first time I watched the movie, Bella. I was shaken from the monotony of my thought and notions of right action. He sat in the abortion facility with her. He refused to abandon her no matter her choice. He wanted her to have love and life, but that was only possible if he was that love and life in the midst of her darkness. Love only comes from love, and life only comes from life. What does God require of us. Perhaps…

  • Entering those places of death (called “clinics”) with someone – a family member, friend, co-worker, a stranger God puts in your path – holding their hand being the presence of Christ in their tenebrosity, offering love and life.
  • Embracing her, crying with her, and continuing to be the presence of love and life even if she commits such a horror.
  • Inviting into our home the one we do not know, the stranger – the homeless, the refugee, the immigrant – giving a place of rest and care.

These are radical actions that Christians, who have been given something greater than Abraham was given, are scared to do. These are things for which we will unroll a litany of prudential negation. These actions, however, are nothing more than the exercising of the corporal and spiritual works of mercy. Faith requires courage. Are Christians a courageous people? Do we have the courage of Abraham, the faith to let God’s Word sink into the depths of our hearts and there produce thriving jubilant life? May Gad grant it be so. Amen.


Read Full Post »


Death be not proud, though some have called thee
Mighty and dreadfull, for, thou art not soe,
For, those, whom thou think’st, thou dost overthrow,
Die not, poore death, nor yet canst thou kill mee;
From rest and sleepe, which but thy pictures bee,
Much pleasure, then from thee, much more must flow,
And soonest our best men with thee doe goe,
Rest of their bones, and soules deliverie.
Thou’art slave to Fate, chance, kings, and desperate men,
And dost with poyson, warre, and sicknesse dwell,
And poppie, or charmes can make us sleepe as well,                                                             And better then they stroake; why swell’st thou then?
One short sleepe past, wee wake eternally,
And death shall be no more, Death thou shalt die.

Read Full Post »

Last year for the beginning of Lent I wrote a post, “The Deconstruction of Lent”, on the need to have a greater awareness of the communal character of Lent in the life of the Church rather than making Lent an individualized affair: HERE. A couple of weeks after that I wrote another Lenten post, “Combatting Porn During Lent”, the main point of which was to draw attention to our need to allow ourselves to be formed by God rather than thinking of Lent as an opportunity to form ourselves: HERE.

Lent is fast approaching – Wednesday, March 1. I don’t know about you, but I can often drive myself crazy trying to figure out what I should give up for Lent or what additional practices I should take on. But what if the answer is nothing? Lent and its disciplines are not something we put on ourselves. It is part of the Life in which we live. What if God simply calls us to live that life: to be faithful in our participation at Sunday Mass, our fasting, and our Friday abstentions. What if He simply wants us to be formed by Lent by participating in the various Lenten traditions of our parish: Stations of the Cross, Lenten missions, soup dinners and fish fries. God doesn’t wait until Lent to call us nearer to Him. Lent is strengthening for that journey already begun. Perhaps there are disciplines He has called you to and Lent is simply a time to persevere in those disciplines, disciplines which may fall away if we cover them with others. If you are still considering what it is God is calling you to do in the coming week, remember, Lent isn’t meant to be complicated; it just needs to be lived. May God bestow His grace upon you abundantly and may you have a blessed and holy Lent.

Read Full Post »

Fr. Aidan Kimel has a good post on the vice of acedia over at Eclectic Orthodoxy. I first learned of this particular vice about 1 1/2 years ago. My attention had been directed to a book from Ignatius Press: The Noonday Devil: Acedia, the Unnamed Evil of Our Times.


This is an excellent book which outlines the development of thought and approaches to acedia. It is very readable and quite interesting. The author, Jean-Charles Nault, O.S.B., begins by stating how he had somewhat taken knowledge of acedia for granted. This was due to it being part of his formation as a Benedictine via St. John Cassian and others. He wrote the above book as a response to no one outside of religious formation knowing anything about it, as well as seeing how prevalent it is in our day.

Recently, I have been starting to see more material being promoted on this subject. Last month my attention was brought to Acedia and Its Discontents: Metaphysical Boredom in an Empire of Desire.


Now Fr. Aidan introduces yet another book on this vice: Despondency: The Spiritual Teaching of Evagrius of Pontus.


It is good to see an increase in books and articles concerning acedia. It truly is one of the greatest plagues of modern man, as well as a subtle, potent, and tenacious destructive force in society. In addition to the Noonday Devil, which I have already had the pleasure of reading, I will be reading the other two books. It is something I encourage everyone to learn more about and to use these tools for serious self-examination.

Read Full Post »

My pastor has been speaking of the new evangelization during his homilies for months, and he’ll be speaking about it for many more months. After introducing this topic to his flock, he began unfolding the phases of the new evangelization. The first phase, which he spoke about during Advent, is hearing and encountering the Word. The second, which he spoke about during Christmas, is answering Jesus’s call – not a call to go forth (yet), but a call to Him, an entrusting of our lives to Him and entering into the intimacy of His love, the love of the Holy Trinity. During Lent he is talking about the third phase of the new evangelization – formation. We have heard the Word, answered the call of He Who Is the Word, and now it is time to allow ourselves to be formed and shaped in Him.

The 40 days of Lent recall previous periods of “40”. The Israelites were formed in the desert for 40 years before entering the Promised Land. The prophet Elijah fasted for 40 days before coming into the Lord’s presence on Mt. Horeb (the same mountain as where Moses had come into the Lord’s presence). Jesus Christ fasted for 40 days before beginning His public ministry, and He remained on Earth with His disciples for 40 days between the Resurrection and Ascension. In all of these cases God is forming those progressing through the 40 days or years. So too with Lent: we recognize that it is a period of 40 days in which God is forming us. However, during Lent it is not uncommon for people to take actions in which they attempt to form themselves rather than let themselves be formed. Over at The Catholic Gentleman there is a piece on giving up porn for Lent. It had some interesting ideas – particularly the Blue Label challenge which I had never heard before. (As an aside, I would turn that challenge on its head: having the bottle at the end of that long road for whoever is walking it). It’s a good article and I recommend checking it out. It got me thinking again about Lenten practices, this time in regards to our vices. In particular it made me ponder what consists of an attempt to form ourselves and what consists of allowing ourselves to be formed by God. For the sake of simplicity this post will focus on only one vice: lust manifested through the compulsive use of pornography. However, what is said below can apply to any compulsive action. If porn isn’t a problem for you then pick your poison and substitute it below.

It is not uncommon for people to give up porn for Lent in an effort to live more intimately in Christ. Generally, if one does this it is typical (and smart) to make a plan. Such is the case at The Catholic Gentleman. They provide ideas and make suggestions so those seeking to be free of porn may not only have real support, but also may “retrain [their] brain”. There are two problems, however, with giving up a vice or a particular manifestation (in this case pornography) of that vice for Lent. First,

Boromir - habit

This is true even when one has an army of supporters and a belt with every conceivable weapon at your disposal. Giving up pornography for Lent is similar to making a New Year’s resolution.

Lent definition

If by the end of Lent this action still persists or has gotten worse it makes one even more susceptible to the Evil One’s whispers of defeat and self-loathing.

One really must wonder though – and this brings us to the second problem – is a particular sin what one is suppose to give up for Lent? Aren’t we suppose to always be giving up sin? The blessing of Lent (one of many) is that we receive greater spiritual strengthening in our struggle against sin, and in our pursuit of virtue and drawing nearer to God. The “Prayer over the people” during Lent is an example of this. Through the Church’s prayers and disciplines, we receive the grace we need to carry out our own Lenten disciplines and be formed by Christ. Remember, it is God who forms us, not ourselves. The question now is not whether or not to give up looking at pornography for Lent, but rather what discipline(s) should one exercise that will draw them nearer to Christ and His Sacred Heart, thereby leading to detachment from the demon of lust and attachment to God Most Holy?

When it comes to compulsive behaviors there are no easy answers and no easy paths. The problem is multi-faceted and so are the solutions. There is so much that can be said. These battles, however, are always first and foremost spiritual battles. Therefore, in addition to the suggestions and exhortation given by The Catholic Gentleman, I’d like to reflect on the opportunities of a particularly Lenten character that are afforded to someone during this season to combat pornography.

One’s struggle with pornography is a battle against the demon of lust. “[A]gainst the demon of unchastity and the desire of the flesh,” St. John Cassian* tells us that the battle must be fought on two fronts: the body and the soul. For the body he recommends fasting. For the soul he recommends “contrition of heart, intense prayer to God, frequent meditation on the Scriptures, toil and manual labor.” A little further he says, “Humility of soul helps more than everything else, however, and without it no one can overcome unchastity or any other sin.”

Excepting the 40 days between the Resurrection and the Ascension, each of the above periods of formation are characterized by fasting. Fasting is an ancient discipline of the Church with a very long tradition of practice during Lent. In regards to our topic, it helps one not simply overcome addiction to pornography, but also fosters greater malleability in being formed in Christ. Why?

Sacred Heart Valentine

For as much as it hurts when we give up a vicious practice, we are not dying. The person who gives up pornography is doing a very good thing; it is like the person daily ingesting poison who then stops. What has been given up though is not something necessary for life or something that adds qualitatively to one’s life, but rather something detrimental to it. The person who abstains from certain goods such as chocolate (that’d be me this year) also does a good thing, but again they are not giving up something necessary to live. Fasting on the other hand is a practice which signifies the giving of our lives to Christ (our dying in Him) most fully because we are giving up something necessary for living. Christ -as the picture indicates above – gave all of Himself for us; He gave His life. Additionally, in a physical way fasting reminds us of our dependence on God, that we do not live by bread alone.

For the soul, St. Cassian recommends the exercise of multiple practices. I’d like to focus on one: contrition of heart. Connected to this are tears. Tears are a gift from God and a manifestation of our contrition of heart. Tears can act as a sacrament (little “s”), purifying our heart from evil inclinations. Tears indicate sadness – a sorrow for our sins. Sorrow for our sins can be very powerful, so much so that as Fr. Z points out  we can attain complete detachment from sin through it.

When it comes to complete detachment from sin, even venial, few of us live in that state all the time.  Nevertheless, there are times when we have been moved to sorrow for sin after examination of conscience, perhaps after an encounter with God as mystery in liturgical worship or in the presence of human suffering, that we come to a present horror and shame of sin that moves us to reject sin entirely.

Tears also indicate a recognition of our needing to be saved. However, it is not enough that one recognizes their powerlessness and need for salvation. One must also be accepting of it, allowing themselves to receive it. In faith one must truly believe that God has saved them and can raise them from their misery. In faith they must be brought to hope. Tears are waters of rebirth nourishing the soil of our heart, making it a fruitful ground for salvation and joy. Speaking of tears as a remedy against acedia, Jean-Charles Nault, O.S.B says:

[Tears] are like water that falls on a rock and, over time, manages to penetrate it. They are like water that flows over the shell of our stony heart, so that it might become a heart of flesh. Little by little they will transform our heart so as to make it docile to the Lord. They will make a notch so that mercy might pour into that gap, into that wound, just as the mercy of God was engulfed in Christ’s wound of love on the Cross. (p. 38)

There is a particularly common practice during Lent which lends itself quite well to encouraging tears: the Stations of the Cross. This devotion is offered every Friday at almost every single parish during Lent. Go to the Stations of the Cross. In addition to fostering contrition of heart, it also provides the opportunity to meditate on the Scriptures, can prompt us to intense forms of prayer, and depending on our physical fitness even provide some toil – all things that St. John Cassian recommends in fighting against the demon of unchastity. Even if it doesn’t bring about physical tears (and it’s fine if it doesn’t), it will help bring about tears of the heart.

Finally, lust twists relationships; it stunts them. The lustful person is not truly free nor full of life; they are not able to fully love others. In the Constitutions of the Secular Order of the Teresian Carmel it says, “In [the promise of chastity] the Secular Carmelite seeks the freedom to love God and neighbor unselfishly.” As one moves from darkness to light, from unchastity to chastity, it is good to spend greater time in fellowship with others, to form positive relationships and more connections in your parish community. Many parishes offer a soup supper every Friday after Stations of the Cross.

What we do during Lent should have a distinctive Lenten flavor. Always combat the use of porn, but during Lent instead of “giving up” porn take on the life of the Church as it is given to us this season. And in all things humility. To repeat the above, “Humility of soul helps more than everything else.” There is a saying from the Desert Fathers: “Obedience has the promise of humility.” What does obedience look like for a layman? Devotionally, one way is following the disciplines and traditions of the Church. For Lent these are fasting on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday, abstaining from meat on Fridays, and taking on a Lenten practice most especially along the lines of prayer, fasting, and almsgiving.

*Quotes taken from St. John Cassian’s On the Eight Vices can be found in the first volume of The Philokalia.

Read Full Post »

Battle Between Carnival and Lent

Battle Between Carnival and Lent, Jan M. Molenaer

The above painting is not what the reality should be, yet it is better than what the reality now is. There is an intimate connection between Carnival (Fat Tuesday, Mardi Gras) and Lent. We’ve lost the former and we have been progressively losing the latter.

In the Roman Church, Lent is not exactly an austere season. It’s penitential, but there isn’t a lot asked of Roman Catholics by the Church. All that is required is to fast on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday (the fast isn’t strict either), and to abstain from meat on Friday. This is all; nothing more. In addition, it is customary for people to give something up. This is devotional. One is not required to do this nor is one bound to keep their private observance. They also set the conditions for their observance. The biggest thing on people’s minds is “What am I giving up for Lent?” With large parish communities and very little regular one-on-one spiritual direction this became a question for the individual without real assistance from another qualified person in the spiritual life. This and other various reasons led to Lent becoming a highly individualized affair. The problem is that living in the Church is not an individual affair.

We are one body and the life of the Christian can only be lived in the communion of the Church. Lenten practice becoming highly individualized has resulted in a weaker awareness of the meaning of Lent. This has resulted in a plethora of blog posts, programs, and opinion pieces on how to make the practice of Lent truly fruitful or even “the best Lent ever.” There are more and more attention-getters saying, “Don’t give up chocolate. Do this instead.” Sometimes “this” refers to other pleasures to give up such as hot showers. Other times “this” refers to something like a book study or daily devotionals sent by email. The problem is that Lent is a penitential season and some of these are not penitential acts or they are penitential in a disordered way. But this isn’t about penance for penance’s sake.

Sheen - Lent

Our Lenten practices should draw us nearer to God and do so in accord with the distinctiveness of the season as opposed to other seasons of the year. Book studies and daily reflections are good, but they aren’t distinctive to Lent. This doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t be part of one’s Lenten practice. The problem is we are starting to see them pitted against traditional Lenten practices that are rooted in the Church’s life. We are starting to be told that attending a book study or receiving daily reflections in our email can take the place of abstinence. There is no opposition here though. In what way does going to a book study or receiving daily reflections oppose giving something up? This increasing movement of promoting a Lent with meaning is being done without reason at the expense of a good and strong Catholic custom.

It is not simply about giving something up though. Venerable Sheen’s words help us here as well. What does giving up hot showers benefit us if there is no change in our prayer? What does it benefit us if it does not prompt us to give alms for those who do not have a choice in whether they take a cold shower or not – and by this I mean our neighbors right here in the United States? What does it benefit us if we persist in a compulsive use of the things in our life, a compulsive use that takes us from God? (The writer who recommended giving up hot showers said nothing about prayer, almsgiving, or time given to God. It basically boiled down to: “Yes, it sucks, but Jesus died on the Cross for you, so…”). Abstaining from certain foods and drinks on the other hand gives us reminders throughout the day to turn to God. The physical feelings and the desires we experience prompt us to raise our minds and hearts to God. They also teach through experience detachment (as does increased almsgiving) which frees the soul to give of itself to God and others.

When confusion abounds and practice goes in so many different directions, some of which may be dubious, it is time to go back to basics. No season of the liturgical year is ultra-individualized in its practice and this includes Lent. Living a Christian life means living an ecclesial life. The Church does give a Lenten life – other practices in addition to what is required. In the United States of America the following are commonly practiced in Roman Catholic parishes during Lent:

  1. Stations of the Cross every Friday
  2. Having a soup supper as a community after praying the Stations of the Cross every Friday
  3. Reconciliation services
  4. 24 Hours for the Lord
  5. Lenten missions (usually two to three consecutive evenings)
  6. Fish fries

Participating in a greater part of the Church’s liturgical and communal life is the foundation for living the life in Christ and drawing nearer to God. The liturgical and communal life of the Church should be the basis for our Lenten practices. Finally, there are ways of participating in the life of the Church through common customs. In the Roman Catholic Church giving something up for Lent is one of these customs. Let us embrace it.


Read Full Post »